Legal Opinion

Payne v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 22, 2003No. 25719PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

Petitioner, Geoffrey Payne (“Payne”) asserts that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to counsel for co-defendant’s comment on Payne’s right not to testify.

Factual/Procedural History

Geoffrey Payne (“Payne”) was convicted of murder and criminal conspiracy,1 and this Court affirmed his convictions *644on direct appeal. State v. Payne, Op. No. 98-MO-008 (S.C. Sup.Ct. filed January 26, 1998). Payne applied for post-conviction (“PCR”) relief, which was dismissed. Payne’s counsel petitioned for a writ of certiorari requesting to be relieved as counsel. Johnson v. State,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Gallman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Gill v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API