Payne v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL:
Petitioner, Geoffrey Payne (“Payne”) asserts that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to counsel for co-defendant’s comment on Payne’s right not to testify.
Factual/Procedural History
Geoffrey Payne (“Payne”) was convicted of murder and criminal conspiracy,1 and this Court affirmed his convictions *644on direct appeal. State v. Payne, Op. No. 98-MO-008 (S.C. Sup.Ct. filed January 26, 1998). Payne applied for post-conviction (“PCR”) relief, which was dismissed. Payne’s counsel petitioned for a writ of certiorari requesting to be relieved as counsel. Johnson v. State,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Gallman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Gill v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dempsey v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Payne v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003