Legal Opinion

Payne v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 22, 2003No. 25719Published

1Opinion of the Court

355 S.C. 642 (2003)

586 S.E.2d 857

Geoffrey R. PAYNE, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of South Carolina, Respondent.

No. 25719.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Submitted March 19, 2003.

Decided September 22, 2003.

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Chief, Capital & Collateral Litigation Donald J. Zelenka, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Allen Bullard, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

Chief Justice TOAL:

Petitioner, Geoffrey Payne ("Payne") asserts that his counsel was ineffective…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Carlos Garza De Luna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. Randy Lamont Patterson AKA Randy Brown, Marcus Wayne Edmundson, Tony Burton, Don Grogans, and Billy Ray BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Allen Scott JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Walter H. McClure and Anthony TafoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API