Chappell v. Wenholz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 In this appeal we decide whether participants in a brawl can be held jointly liable under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-2506(D)(1) (2003) for injuries inflicted on common foes. We hold that under the circumstances of this case, sufficient evidence exists that defendants/appellees William Wenholz and Michael Bean acted in concert to inflict injuries on plaintiffs/appellants Daniel T. Chappell and Steve C. Romano. The trial court erred by entering partial summary judgment to the contrary, and we therefore reverse and remand for additional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. Mabery Ranch, Co., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Hunt v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Johnson v. PankratzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- A.G. Ex Rel. Grundemann v. Paradise Valley Unified School District No. 69Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Lewis v. Dirt Sports LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Hausauer v. Mesa, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020