Legal Opinion

Esparza v. Horn MacHinery Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1987No. Docket 85514PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Ismael Esparza (hereinafter plaintiff) was injured while operating a mechanical power press at work. Plaintiff and his wife sued defendant, the seller or broker of the machine, alleging negligence and breach of implied warranty. Plaintiff’s wife claimed loss of consortium. The jury found that defendant was not negligent and breached no implied warranty. On appeal, plaintiff and his wife claim that the jury was erroneously instructed. Defendant cross-appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for directed verdict. We affirm.

The basic facts are undisputed. Plaintiff was employed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eide v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Kujawski v. CohenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Love v. BrumleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Muriel Laney, Personal Representative of the Estate of William Laney v. Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Beasley v. WashingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Muriel Laney, Personal Representative of the Estate of William Laney v. Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API