Legal Opinion

Muriel Laney, Personal Representative of the Estate of William Laney v. Celotex Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1990No. 89-1217Published

1Opinion of the Court

901 F.2d 1319

30 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 152

Muriel LANEY, personal representative of the estate of

William Laney, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CELOTEX CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-1217.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 17, 1989.

Decided April 25, 1990.

1

William L. Martens (argued), Miller, Cohen, Martens & Ice, Southfield, Mich., for plaintiff-appellee.

2

Noreen L. Slank (argued), Dale J. McLellan, Collins, Einhorn & Farrell, Southfield, Mich., for defendant-appellant.

3

Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges; and JOHNSTONE, Chief District Judge*.

4

JOHNSTONE, Chief District…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald SchrockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Brisboy v. Fibreboard Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Carl W. Hines v. Joy Manufacturing Company and Long-Airdox Company, a Division of the Marmon Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Larry R. Williams v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Holloway v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API