Legal Opinion

Clark County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 13, 2011No. 39546-1-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.

¶1 — In 2004, Clark County (County) designated the 19 land parcels at issue in this case as agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance (ALLTCS).1 Despite identifying these parcels as having long-term commercial significance for the agricultural in*214dustry in the County, less than three years later, in 2007, the County removed the 19 parcels from ALLTCS status. Simultaneously with the dedesignation, the County included the 19 parcels in its then existing urban growth areas (UGAs). Although the ALLTCS designation process and the redrawing of the UGA boundaries are separate…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clark County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Town of Woodway v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Clark County v. WESTERN WASH. GROWTH MGT.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Clallam County v. Dry Creek CoalitionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Clark County v. W. Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hearings Review Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API