Legal Opinion
Secci v. United Independent Taxi Drivers, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 2017No. B270082PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
—Plaintiff and appellant Emanuele Secci appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants and respondents United Independent Taxi Drivers, Inc. (United Independent), and United Taxi of the Southwest (United Southwest) (collectively, United). Secci obtained a jury verdict for damages suffered after a motorcycle crash with defendant Aram Tonakanian. Tonakanian was driving a green and white taxi marked with United’s insignia. The jury found Tonakanian to be United’s agent, but not an employee. The court granted United’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) under…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Meyer v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Linton v. Desoto Cab Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Robert MawhinneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Estate of Linda Miller v. County of SutterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.