Legal Opinion
Condit v. Solvang Municipal Improvement District
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 8, 1983No. Civ. 67567PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ABBE, J.
Appeal from a denial of preliminary injunction. This controversy arises out of adoption by the respondent Solvang Municipal Improvement District (SMID) on September 16, 1982, of ordinance number 59 which increased the rates and connection fees for water service within the district. Appellant is a property owner within the district and contends the respondent’s procedure in enacting ordinances is invalid.
Respondent is a special district created and operating pursuant to authority granted by the Legislature in the Solvang Municipal Improvement District Act of 1951 (Stats. 1951,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Carlton Santee Corp. v. Padre Dam Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Solvang Municipal Improvement District v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beaumont Investors v. Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Westlands Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Great Oaks Water Co. v. Santa Clara Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Surfrider Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- SF Urban Forest Coalition v. City and County of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 2019