Michigan Department of Treasury v. Senczyszyn (In Re Senczyszyn)
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING BANKRUPTCY COURT’S OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
The court in this appeal is presented with two questions of law. First, which section or sections of the Bankruptcy Code govern how to characterize a “straddling” tax claim, specifically whether it is a post-petition claim under the statutory scheme enacted by Congress for chapter 13 bankruptcies. Second, if 11 U.S.C. § 1305 governs, the court must decide at what time a straddling tax claim “become[s] payable” as that phrase is used in that section.
I.BACKGROUND
The essential facts of this matter…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re City of DetroitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Michigan v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012