Mull v. Kerstetter
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Snyder County sustaining the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer of the defendant/appellee/ Abraham F. Kerstetter and dismissing the complaint of the plaintiffs/appellants/Rick L. and Dianne L. Mull, his wife. We reverse.
In assessing the propriety of the actions of the court below, we must keep the following in mind; namely:
The standards for sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer are quite strict. A demurrer admits every well-pleaded material fact set forth in the pleadings…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Gekas v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Creeger Brick & Building Supply Inc. v. Mid-State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Bester v. Essex Crane Rental Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. D'AMBROSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Philmar Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. York Street Associates IISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Hopkins v. MedeirosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.