Legal Opinion

Bank of French Broad, Inc. v. Bryan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1954No. 94PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Appellant, in its brief, does not deal separately with each challenged allegation. It presents its position as if the case were before us on demurrer to defendants’ Further Answer and Defense, challenging the sufficiency of defendants’ pleading to constitute a defense rather than the propriety of particular allegations.

As stated by Ervin, J.: “A motion to strike an allegation from a pleading for irrelevancy admits, for the purposes of the motion, the truth of all facts well pleaded in the allegation, and any inferences fairly deducible from them. But it does not admit the conclusions of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elam v. Smithdeal Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. GrannickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Boney, Insurance Comr. v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Case v. . EwbanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Mayo v. American Fire & Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Wiles v. MullinaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Fli-Back Company, Inc. v. Philadelphia Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company and Affiliated Fm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API