Legal Opinion

Mills v. . Hansel

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Lane, J., at November Term, 1914, of ANSON.

1Opinion of the Court

Claek, O. J".

This is an action by plaintiff for $50 due ber for services as stenographer to tbe defendant and $5 in stamps used on bis correspondence. Tbe summons was issued by a justice of tbe peace 10 July, 1911, returnable 9 September. Tbe defendant having left tbe State, service was bad by attaching property of tbe defendant ($15 in money) and publication of notice. At tbe trial before tbe justice tbe defendant entered a special appearance and moved to dismiss tbe action because it appeared tbe summons was returnable more than thirty days from tbe issuance of tbe same. Rev., 1445. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pasour v. . LinebergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Grocery Company v. Bag Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Price v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  4. Branch v. . FrankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. Cape Lookout Co. v. . GoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Jenette v. Hovey & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Mohn v. . CresseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Bethell v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Town of Asheboro v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API