Legal Opinion

Bethell v. . Lee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 13, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BbogdeN, J.-

The vital question of law presented by the record is whether the attachment proceedings in the case of F. B. Lee v. Geo. W. Bethell were valid.

Attachment is a statutory remedy in derogation of common law, and hence must be strictly construed. Notwithstanding, substantial compliance with the requirements of the statute is sufficient. Best v. British & American Co., 128 N. C., 351; Page v. McDonald, 159 N. C., 38.

It is to be noted that the summons in the attachment suit was returned by the sheriff “not to be found in Rockingham County.” Nothing else appearing, this return would be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Page v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Grocery Company v. Bag Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Best v. British & American Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. Jenette v. Hovey & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. S. B. Luttrell & Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Denton v. . VassiliadesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Groce v. . GroceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Brown v. DobySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Connolly v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Voehringer v. . PollockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API