Legal Opinion

Ely Valley Mines, Inc., Pioche Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Americo L. Campini, Leland Donahue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1981No. 78-3425PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAKASUGI, District Judge:

Plaintiffs, commenced this action for damages against their court-appointed receiver, Americo L. Campini; Hartford Acci dent and Indemnity Co., surety on the receiver’s bond; and Leland Donahue who assisted the receiver.

The action was initially brought in a Nevada state court and removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(3) to the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.

The district court denied remand and subsequently dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiffs appeal both these rulings. We affirm. Our jurisdiction is founded upon 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

I

REMOVAL

Appel…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Maryland v. Soper, JudgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Kurt Von Poppenheim v. Portland Boxing & Wrestling CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Gay v. RuffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Hiram Ash v. Eugene CvetkovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Akin v. Big Three IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Akin v. Ashland Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Isaac Camacho v. Autoridad De Telefonos De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API