Legal Opinion

Duval Ranching Co. v. Glickman

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 14, 1997No. CV-N-95-38-ECRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiffs are ranchers. They have sued the United States, the United States Forest Service, and individual federal officers for a variety of violations of state and federal law. 1 The dispute is essentially over property rights and land use in and around the Humboldt National Forest in Elko County, Nevada. Defendants have moved for summary judgment (# 76) as to all of Plaintiffs’ claims, Plaintiffs have opposed (#80), and Defendants have replied (# 83). For the reasons outlined below, we GRANT summary judgment to Defendants.

BACKGROUND

The properties at…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Public Lands for the People, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  3. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  4. Pacific Land Partners, LLC v. Department of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Pacific Land Partners, LLC v. Dept. of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API