Duval Ranching Co. v. Glickman
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiffs are ranchers. They have sued the United States, the United States Forest Service, and individual federal officers for a variety of violations of state and federal law. 1 The dispute is essentially over property rights and land use in and around the Humboldt National Forest in Elko County, Nevada. Defendants have moved for summary judgment (# 76) as to all of Plaintiffs’ claims, Plaintiffs have opposed (#80), and Defendants have replied (# 83). For the reasons outlined below, we GRANT summary judgment to Defendants.
BACKGROUND
The properties at…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Public Lands for the People, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Pacific Land Partners, LLC v. Department of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Pacific Land Partners, LLC v. Dept. of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.