Legal Opinion

Sheean v. Michel

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1936No. S. F. 15469PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff became the purchaser at an execution sale of certain lots situated in Alameda County. He brought the present action to quiet his title thereto against the claims of the defendants. The court ordered judgment for the defendants, from which judgment the plaintiff appealed.

The claims of the defendants were based upon a declaration of trust executed by the defendant, Emile Michel, purporting to convey extensive real property, including the lots here involved, to himself in trust. The instrument was recorded in Alameda County on January 26, 1932. A judgment for the sum of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Carpenter v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Estate of Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Morgan'S EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Tennant v. John Tennant Memorial HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Estate of JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Housing Authority of Newark v. Norfolk Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Cutter v. Seror (In Re Cutter)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Estate of MichelettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API