Legal Opinion
Newsome v. Young Supply Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 11, 2012No. Case No. 11-10149PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND AND CERTIFY ORDER FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING DETERMINATION OF APPEAL
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff James Newsome brought this action under the Family & Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq., alleging that Young Supply Company, Staffing Source Personnel, Inc. d/b/a Driver Source, Inc., and Driver Source, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) violated his job restoration rights under the FMLA when they refused to restore his original job position as a truck driver, or an equivalent position…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. MehraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels, Debtors. Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels, Debtors-Appellants v. Bot Financial Corp., Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Harbert v. Healthcare Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Graham v. Hubbs Machine & Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
- Atmosphere Hospitality Management Services, LLC v. Royal Realties, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Arab American Civil Rights League v. Donald TrumpDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Carter v. Tennessee Department of Children's ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Delgado v. Emortgage Funding, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.