Legal Opinion

Security National Bank v. Cohen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

The only issue raised by appellant-defendant on this appeal which we deem possesses sufficient merit to warrant our consideration is that plaintiff’s foreclosure action is barred by sec. 180.787, Stats. This statute provides in part:

“The dissolution of a corporation shall not take away or impair any remedy available to or against such corporation, its directors, officers or shareholders, for any right or claim existing or any liability incurred, prior to such dissolution if action or other proceeding thereon is commenced within 2 years after the date of such dissolution. . . ”

Strangely, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lindemann v. RuskWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Markus v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Syver v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State ex rel. Pabst v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. O'NEILL v. Continental Illinois Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dillman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  2. Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. KlomstenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  3. United States ex rel. Small Business Administration v. PalakowDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
  4. United States v. PalakowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. PalakowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API