Legal Opinion

Syver v. Hahn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1959PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

The county court and circuit court of Walworth county have concurrent jurisdiction of the subject matter involved. In State ex rel. White v. District Court (1952), 262 Wis. 139, 143, 54 N. W. (2d) 189, this court held:

“In a case in which two courts are given concurrent jurisdiction over a particular subject matter, and one of such courts has assumed jurisdiction, it is reversible error for the other to also assume jurisdiction. Kusick v. Kusick (1943), 243 Wis. 135, 9 N. W. (2d) 607; and Cawker v. Dreutser (1928), 197 Wis. 98, 129, 221 N. W. 401.”

Respondent maintains he had the right to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cawker v. DreutzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Kusick v. KusickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. White v. District Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Kienbaum v. HabernyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Teague v. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa IndiansWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee v. The Federal Land Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. Shetney v. ShetneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  5. Teague v. Bad River Band of Lake Superior TribeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API