Legal Opinion

Boltz v. Graf

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1934No. 1738—6171Published

1Opinion of the Court

HARVEY, Presiding Judge.

This suit was brought by the defendant in error, Mrs. Bertha Graf, against the plaintiffs in error, Louis Boltz and his wife, on a promissory note for the principal sum of $3,-000 accrued interest, and attorney’s fees, and for foreclosure of a deed of trust lien on certain land. The case was tried to the court, without a jury, resulting in a judgment for Mrs. Graf for the amount sued for, with foreclosure of the lien. The Court of Civil Appeals has affirmed that judgment. 43 S.W. (2d) 469.

The material facts are substantially as follows:

On September 26, 1928, Boltz and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boltz v. GrafCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Hicks v. HugoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  3. Dietzel v. MartinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API