Cam I, Inc. And Blue Sky Video, Inc. v. Louisville/jefferson County Metro Government
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, Cam I, Inc. and Blue Sky Video, Inc., (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s November 17, 2003 order, denying Plaintiffs’ motion to alter, amend, or vacate the district court’s July 18, 2003 order. The district court’s July 18, 2003 order modified a March 21, 2003 preliminary injunction, which had enjoined Defendant, Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, from enforcing an adult entertainment ordinance in its entirety. The July 18, 2003 modification severed the ordinance’s licensing provisions from the remainder of the ordinance, thereby…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Christopher Sullivan v. Sam BenningfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Green Party of Tennessee v. Tre HargettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Hamilton County Education Ass'n v. Hamilton County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Jeanna Norris v. Samuel Stanley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Kenjoh Outdoor, LLC v. Jack MarchbanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.