Legal Opinion

Angell v. Arnett

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1924No. 11,734PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.

This is an action by appellee against appellant to recover damages. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first is based on the alleged negligence of appellant in striking appellee’s automobile with a truck, both of which, at the time, were being driven on a public highway. The second is the same as the first, except that instead of alleging that said act was negligently and carelessly done, it alleges that it was wilfully and maliciously done. The complaint was answered by a general denial. The cause was submitted to a jury for trial, resulting in a verdict in favor of appellee. The jury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. RitcheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. De BoltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. City of Indianapolis v. MossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Tucker v. EastridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pettibone v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gingerich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API