Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gingerich v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1948No. 28,455PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION.

Gilkison, J.

I dissent from the opinion filed in this case for the following reasons:

The defendant was prosecuted under the criminal laws of the State of Indiana by an affidavit filed in the court below, which omitting the caption, signature, verification and approval, reads as follows:

“Ruth Glassburn swears he is informed and believes that Chester Gingerich and Mattie Gingerich, on or about the 12th day of November, 1947, at and in Jay County, State of Indiana, did then and there unlawfully being the parents of one Joseph Gingerich a child under the full age of sixteen (16)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Rhoades v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. RitcheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Littell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Romary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Pease v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gingerich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API