Connelly v. Usko Holding Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDodd, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage for $9,000. The defendant fire insurance company has interposed a counterclaim alleging that it issued a policy of fire insurance insuring the premises covered by the mortgage and that the policy was in standard form containing the usual standard mortgagee clause which provides: “ This insurance as to the interest of the mortgagee (or trustee) only therein, shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the within described property, * * * Whenever this company shall pay the mortgagee (or trustee) any sum for loss or…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Ross v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Dollar Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Herbert Kallen, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978