Philyaw v. City of Kinston
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNboene, C. J.
The pivotal question here is whether judgment as of nonsuit was proper upon the evidence offered, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Well settled principles, appropriate to the factual situation, require an affirmative answer. See Mintz v. Murphy, 235 N.C. 304, 69 S.E. 2d 849; Pugh v. Power Co., 237 N.C. 693, 75 S.E. 2d 766; Davis v. Light Co., 238 N.C. 106, 76 S.E. 2d 378; Alford v. Washington, 238 N.C. 694, 78 S.E. 2d 915, and cases cited, and many others.
“In action for death by wrongful act based on negligence, the burden rests on the plaintiff to produce evidence sufficient…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Mintz v. Town of MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Alford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Ellis v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Davis v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Floyd v. NashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Partin v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Ferriss v. CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASS'N., INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.