Legal Opinion

Ramon Yacap Yadao, Dencio Yacap Yadao, Arturo Yacap Yadao v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1996No. 94-70150Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

78 F.3d 596

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Ramon Yacap YADAO, Dencio Yacap Yadao, Arturo Yacap Yadao, Petitioners,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 94-70150.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 26, 1996.

Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Evaristo Rangel-GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Edgars Laipenieks v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Town of North Bonneville v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Caddali v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API