Legal Opinion
United States v. Evaristo Rangel-Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1980No. 79-1439PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a conviction of illegal entry after deportation. 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (1976). We are called upon to apply the standards laid down in United States v. Calderon-Medina, 591 F.2d 529 (9th Cir. 1979), for collateral attacks on deportation based on violations of INS regulations.
This matter was first before this Court as a companion to United States v. Calderon-Medina. The trial court had dismissed the indictment on the ground that, in the underlying deportation, the INS had failed to advise the defendant of his right to consult with Mexican Consular…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Missouri Ex Rel. Gaines v. CanadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. Eziquio Calderon-Medina, United States of America v. Evaristo Rangel-GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Ramon Gasca-KraftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Pettis ex rel. United States v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Breard v. PruettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Rocha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Shweta Kohli v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Jose Lombera-CamorlingaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Juan Chaparro-Alcantara and Jaime Romero-BautistaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.