Legal Opinion
Edgars Laipenieks v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1985No. 83-7711PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
Edgars Laipenieks petitions from a Board of Immigrations Appeals (“BIA” or the “Board”) decision finding him deportable under section 241(a)(19) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) [8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(19) ]. The BIA found Laipenieks deportable on the ground that he participated in or assisted the Nazi government in the persecution of Communists because of their political opinion.
Laipenieks argues that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS” or the “government”) failed to prove deportability on the basis of Section 1251(a)(19) by clear, convincing and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fedorenko v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Penasquitos Village, Inc., Penasquitos Gardens, Inc., Penasquitos Hills, Inc., and San Diego Leisure Life Village v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Bohdan Koziy, A/K/A Bogdanus Kosij, A/K/A Bohdan JozijCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. OsidachDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Joseph Tshibang Kalubi v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- T-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Daniel Salvador Hernandez-Guadarrama v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Roberto Ferrer Miranda Alvarado Madeleine Janet Morales Lopez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.