Legal Opinion

Berger v. Clippert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Albert Samter was engaged in business as a cigar manufacturer and-retail dealer in tobacco, at No. 191 Woodbridge street west, in Detroit. He became indebted to different persons, and, being utterly insolvent, made a sale of his retail stock to his step-brother, who is the plaintiff in this suit. Plaintiff was Samter’s foreman, and knew his standing and circumstances, and knew that he was not on a sound footing. He claimed that Samter was owing him $150 for money which he had let him have from time to time out of his earnings, and the consideration of the purchase was this indebtedness and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frederick v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weadock v. KennedyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API