Legal Opinion
State v. Zima
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 2004No. 2003-0090PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
{¶ 1} The facts of this case are undisputed. The parties agree that on July 3, 2001, defendant-appellant, Karen Zima, operated her motor vehicle left of center on Broadview Road in Cleveland and collided with an oncoming motorcycle driven by Gary Schlairet. On July 6, 2001, the city of Cleveland filed a complaint in the Cleveland Municipal Court charging Zima with driving under the influence in violation of Cleveland Codified Ordinances 433.01(a)(1), driving under suspension, failure to yield, and failure to wear a seatbelt. On August 23, 2001, a Cuyahoga County Grand Jury returned a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. CabralesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Dunbar, 87317 (6-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. DyeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.