Legal Opinion

Pendergist v. Pendergist

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 23, 1980No. CA 79-182PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

The appellant sought a nonsuit to her divorce action. The chancellor refused to grant the nonsuit because he regarded the divorce decree as having been rendered from the bench at the divorce hearing, although he recognized that the appellant’s request in her divorce complaint that the court adjudicate property rights had been taken under submission as of the date of the divorce hearing. In his memorandum opinion denying the nonsuit, the chancellor held the divorce had been granted but that he could take no action with respect to the property rights of the parties because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McConnell v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Childress v. McManusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Cook v. LobiancoCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API