Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Bourland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 31, 1927PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

R. H, McConnell was the owner of certain notes secured by mortgage, and brought suit in the Sebastian Chancery Court, Greenwood District, to foreclose said mortgage. The note was given for real estate, and was executed by J. R. Dunning and his wife, Grace Dunning, payable to R. A. Harper. The note and mortgage were transferred by said Harper to the plaintiff, R. H. McConnell, and, as above stated, McConnell brought a foreclosure suit.

The complaint in the foreclosure suit alleged that there were two notes secured by the mortgage, each for $750 at 8 per cent, per annum, the first note due…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. ViersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Lynch v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Melton v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Guar. Tr. & Sav. Bank v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Kelley Trust Co. v. Lundell Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Norfleet v. NorfleetSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Standridge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Hardy v. HardySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Md. v. CowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Cates v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API