J.C. ex rel. J.C. v. Mendham Township Board of Education
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on its application for attorneys’ fees pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3)(B). The Court has decided the matter pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated herein, the Court will deny plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint without prejudice.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff J.C. is a minor who has certain learning disabilities that entitle him to receive specialized educational instruction pursuant to the Individuals with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- J.O., on Behalf of C.O., and J.O. v. Orange Township Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- KR Ex Rel. MR v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF BRENTWOODDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Waterman v. FarmerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Clifford Olshaker, individually and on behalf of his child, S.O., a minor v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- JC v. Mendham Tp. Bd. of Educ.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.