J. S. Lowrey & Co. v. Ulmer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal No. 3, Feb. T., 1896, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming County, June Term, 1895, No. 845, on verdict in favor of defendant. Replevin for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to.Huff Bros, and sold by sheriff on a confessed judgment by vendees to Joseph Ulmer. The value of the goods sold was $172.75. Verdict for defendant and for 6 cents damages. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion of the Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal No. 3, Feb. T., 1896, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming County, June Term, 1895, No. 845, on verdict in favor of defendant. Replevin for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to.Huff Bros, and sold by sheriff on a confessed judgment by vendees to Joseph Ulmer. The value of the goods sold was $172.75. Verdict for defendant and for 6 cents damages. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion of the Superior Court. Errors assigned were among others, (4) refusal to affirm plaintiff’s third point, reciting same as set out in the opinion of the Superior Court; (5) error in…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
J. S. Lowrey & Co., appellants, wholesale dry goods merchants of New York City, seek, through an action of replevin in rescission of a contract, to recover certain goods sold to Huff Bros., retailers of men’s furnishings at Williamsport, Pennsylvania.
On December 26, 1894, a salesman of appellants called upon Huff Bros, at their place of business in Williamsport, and, after exhibiting his samples, received an order for certain goods of the value of $172.75, which were to be delivered the next spring. In accordance with the terms of the order the goods were delivered on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Devoe v. . BrandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Brown v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Bughman v. Central BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Cincinnati Cooperage Co. v. GaulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Perlman & Co. v. Sartorius & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mann v. SalsbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Ralph v. FonDersmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Whiting Manufacturing Co. v. BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Brent v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913