Whiting Manufacturing Co. v. Bank
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 2, Oct. T., 1900, by defendant, in suit of Whiting Manufacturing Company against Fourth Street National Bank, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1898, No. 990, on verdict for plaintiff. Opinion by Beaver, J. Interpleader. Before Bregy, J. It appears from the record that Williams & Ulmer confessed judgment in favor of the Fourth Street National Bank.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 2, Oct. T., 1900, by defendant, in suit of Whiting Manufacturing Company against Fourth Street National Bank, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1898, No. 990, on verdict for plaintiff. Opinion by Beaver, J. Interpleader. Before Bregy, J. It appears from the record that Williams & Ulmer confessed judgment in favor of the Fourth Street National Bank. The Whiting Manufacturing Company claimed certain of the goods thereupon taken in execution, and an issue of interpleader was framed in which the Whiting Manufacturing Company was plaintiff and the Fourth Street…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Beaver, J.,
The issue tried in the court below was framed under the sheriff’s interpleader act, the plaintiff claiming to rescind a sale of certain goods made to Williams & Ulmer whose personal property was levied upon by virtue of an execution issued upon a judgment entered by the defendant, the goods in controversy being included in the levy.
*423The appellant discusses the assignments of error, fifteen in number, under five distinct propositions :
“ 1. The record of the assigned estate of Williams & Ulmer, Ltd., was inadmissible in evidence.” The main issue was as to the insolvency of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HazlettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Cincinnati Cooperage Co. v. GaulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Bollinger v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Bock v. LaumanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hartley Silk Manufacturing Co. v. BergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Healy v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Brent v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913