Legal Opinion
Kehn v. Hoeksema
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1994No. 18704PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
Plaintiff brought declaratory judgment to determine parties’ rights under an Option to purchase real estate. Defendants appeal from summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff. We affirm.
FACTS
On November 2, 1978, Kehn Ranch Inc. entered into ah agreement with Etta and Peter Hoeksema (Hoeksema) for an Option to Lease or Purchase certain real estate owned by Hoeksema. This Option was recorded in the Gregory County Register of Deeds on December 5, 1980. The Option granted Kehn Ranch, its heirs, successors, and assigns the right to match any bona fide offer from third parties should…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sommervold v. GrevlosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Cowell v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Stover v. CritchfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Security National Bank & Trust Co. of Norman v. RichardsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- In Re Kenison's GuardianshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wolff v. Secretary of the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks DepartmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Sioux Falls v. EwoldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Horne v. CrozierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Erickson v. County of BrookingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Arnoldy v. Mahoney & FinnemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.