Legal Opinion

Emery v. United Pacific Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1991No. 18502PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYLE, Justice.

In this appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment, we are called upon to determine whether it was proper for the trial court in confirming the arbitration award to make an award of attorney fees that were incurred during the course of arbitration proceedings, and whether prejudgment interest may be awarded on general damages commencing from the time of injury.

On June 29, 1987, the plaintiff-respondent, Carol Emery, was a pedestrian injured when a car driven by James Porter, struck her in a crosswalk. Porter was an underinsured motorist whose liability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bingham County Commission v. Interstate Electric Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Halliday v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pendlebury v. Western Casualty and Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Reynolds v. American Hardware Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lovey v. Régence BlueShield of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Greenough v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Wolfe v. Farm Bureau InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Moore v. Omnicare, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API