Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1988No. 16726PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge Pro Tem.1

Today we are asked whether Idaho law will support a cause of action in tort against an insurer that negligently failed to make a timely settlement of an insurance claim. The question arises in the context of an appeal from a jury verdict for the plaintiff. The verdict granted the recovery to the plaintiff policy holder for damages suffered when a pending sale of items salvaged from his fire-damaged lease-hold property was lost. The jury agreed with Reynolds’ contention that the defendant’s unreasonable delay in settling his claim was the proximate cause of the loss of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Farmers Group, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Alegria v. PayonkIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Farm Bureau InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Featherston Ex Rel. Featherston v. Allstate InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Emery v. United Pacific InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Inland Group of Companies, Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Meldco, Inc. v. Hollytex Carpet Mills, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API