Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 13, 1984No. CR 84-119PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Appellant was charged with the aggravated robbery of a grocery store in Crossett, Arkansas. At a jury trial, testimony was heard from the admitted accomplice in the robbery and several other witnesses. The appellant, allegedly the gunman, wore a ski mask during the commission of the offense and only the accomplice was able to identify him as the gunman. Appellant was found guilty and sentenced to thirty-five years.

Appellant first argues that a directed verdict should have been granted because of insufficient corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony. A conviction cannot…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Dyas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Harshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scherrer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Strawhacker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Stanley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API