Legal Opinion

In Interest of H.N.T.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 5, 1985No. 84-1500PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

H.N.T. appeals the juvenile court’s order dismissing a Petition for Determination of Status which alleged H.N.T. to be delinquent. The juvenile court found H.N.T. to be eighteen years of age or older. Thus, the juvenile court ruled it did not have subject matter jurisdiction.

We conclude the prior adult court proceedings which litigated the question of H.N.T.’s age estopped the state from relitigating the same question in the juvenile court. The adult court previously determined that H.N.T. was under the age of eighteen years. As a result, that court dismissed a criminal complaint against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. RaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. MacK v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Crowall v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Prentice v. County Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HenleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  5. State v. MendezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API