Bearshield v. John Morrell & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
Appellant Carol Bearshield sued her employer, appellee John Morrell & Co., claiming disability discrimination. In granting John Morrell’s motion for summary judgment, the district ruled, as a matter of law, that Bear-shield was not disabled within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Iowa Civil Rights Act. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12102(2), 12112(a) (1988); Iowa Code §§ 216.2(5), 216.6(l)(a) (1993). Bearshield appealed. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
I. Standard of Review.
We review a summary judgment ruling for correction…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lyle S. Chandler and Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. The City of Dallas, the City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Hubert Wooten v. Farmland FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Louis P. Forrisi v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Mary Ellen Byrne v. Board of Education, School of West Allis-West MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Rebecca A. Berg v. Norand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Teachout v. Forest City Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Crippen v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Fuller v. Iowa Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Vincent v. Four M Paper Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.