Legal Opinion

Bearshield v. John Morrell & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 26, 1997No. 96-852PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

Appellant Carol Bearshield sued her employer, appellee John Morrell & Co., claiming disability discrimination. In granting John Morrell’s motion for summary judgment, the district ruled, as a matter of law, that Bear-shield was not disabled within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Iowa Civil Rights Act. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12102(2), 12112(a) (1988); Iowa Code §§ 216.2(5), 216.6(l)(a) (1993). Bearshield appealed. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

I. Standard of Review.

We review a summary judgment ruling for correction…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Lyle S. Chandler and Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. The City of Dallas, the City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Hubert Wooten v. Farmland FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Louis P. Forrisi v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Mary Ellen Byrne v. Board of Education, School of West Allis-West MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rebecca A. Berg v. Norand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Teachout v. Forest City Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Crippen v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Fuller v. Iowa Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Vincent v. Four M Paper Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API