Legal Opinion

Vahdat v. Holland

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 14, 2007No. Record 061960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Justice CYNTHIA D. KINSER.

In this appeal, we once again address the sudden emergency doctrine and decide what, if anything, an instruction on that subject must include with regard to a defendant's evidentiary burden. Because we conclude that the circuit court did not err by giving a sudden emergency instruction that contained no reference to the defendant's evidentiary burden, we will affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

Toktam Vahdat filed an amended complaint in the circuit court against Anthony Wayne Holland, seeking damages for personal injuries she allegedly sustained as a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Riggsby v. TrittonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  2. Jones v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  3. Velocity Express Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. HugenSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  4. Gaines v. CampbellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  5. Monahan v. Obici Medical Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hancock-Underwood v. KnightSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  2. Gibson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2014
  3. Shannon B. Boyette v. Carrie E. SprouseCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API