Legal Opinion

Tesch v. Board of Deposits

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

In 1921 an act of the legislature (ch. 589, Laws of 1921) created an annuity and benefit fund for Milwaukee policemen, their wives and children. That act established the plaintiff board and provided: That certain amounts specified be deducted from the pay of the policemen; that an assessment be levied by Milwaukee at a rate not to exceed five tenths of a mill on the dollar; and that the money resulting be invested and paid out under specified terms and conditions. Par. 8 of sec. 1, ch. 589, Laws of 1921, provides that the city treasurer is to be custodian of the annuity and benefit fund and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. HoffmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Dowe v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. (1972), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1972
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1978
  5. State Ex Rel. State Aeronautics Commission v. Board of Examiners of StateMontana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API