Legal Opinion

Pecor v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 13, 1988No. 86-324PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.

This is an appeal by General Motors Corporation (manufacturer) from a decision of the Washington Superior Court affirming the decision of the Vermont Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board (Board) in favor of Dale W. Pecor (consumer). Manufacturer contends that the superior court erred in affirming the Board’s decision because it was unsupported by adequate findings and therefore exceeded the Board’s authority, and that the rem edy ordered by the Board was outside its authority. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

This action was brought under the New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Act (Act), 9 V.S.A.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heisse v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  2. In Re Village of Hardwick Electric DepartmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  3. Chaffin v. BittinskySupreme Court of Vermont · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., GMCSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. In Re VilleneuveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. Williams v. Planet Motor Car, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2001
  4. Abraham v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  5. Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., GMCSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API