Legal Opinion

Clausen v. Miller

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1933No. File No. 6162PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr., J.

This is an action by an administratrix to recover the double damages, authorized by § 8709 of the Compiled Laws, from one who is alleged to have embezzled, concealed or alienated the property of a decedent. At the close of the case the defendant moved to dismiss for failure to prove conversion, which motion was denied. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $4,000.00 and judgment was entered thereon. Defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, and the trial court granted a new trial. From this order granting a new trial the plaintiff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Skaar v. EppelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. First National Bank v. BremsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Gohl v. BechtoldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Walker v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Feil v. Northwest German Farmers Mutual InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gleson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ArltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Sullwold v. HogerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Enget Ex Rel. Enget v. NeffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Nicholson v. RoopNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API