Legal Opinion
Maher v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 19, 2010No. 08-12CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
Plaintiffs, former officers and directors of a federal savings and loan association, sue here to recover employment and pension benefits allegedly denied them when the savings and loan was placed into receivership following the enactment of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), Pub.L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183. The case is now before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The parties have briefed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Roland Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marcelino Roldan FonsecaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maher v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017