Legal Opinion
Maher v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 26, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-1646PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
On March 25, 2015, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) denied Plaintiff Jerome Maher’s claim for benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, in connection with a pension plan that was terminated in 1984. Maher filed this lawsuit to challenge the PBGC’s denial (see Compl, ECF No. 1), and the parties have now filed cross-motions for summary judgment (see Mem. in Supp. of Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. (“Def.’s Mem.”), ECF No. 29-1; Mot. to Deny Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rempfer v. SharfsteinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Safe Extensions, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Jerome A. Maher and John R. Gravee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Epsilon Electronics, Inc. v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018