Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Whitehead

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1941No. Civ. 11685PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The defendant in an action for divorce appeals from an order modifying the alimony provisions of the interlocutory decree, from an order denying his motion for a reduction of the award, and from the final decree of divorce.

Plaintiff was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce on April 4, 1934. The decree carried an award of $65 a month as alimony. In December, 1937, defendant filed a motion to reduce the award to $1. In August, 1938, the plaintiff filed a counter motion to fix the award at $50. Both motions rested upon a change of circumstances relating to the temporary employment of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilder v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Lent v. HC Morris Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Davies v. RamsdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bryant v. BryantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Becker v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Furniss v. FurnissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API