Legal Opinion
Metropolitan District Commission v. Codex Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 29, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
At the heart of this case is the question whether the defendant Codex Corporation (Codex) may construct a fence *523of a particular kind, with associated landscaping, on its property in Canton, known as the Prowse Farm, without violating any restriction set forth in an order of taking by the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC).1 On June 7, 1984, the MDC adopted two orders of taking of conservation restrictions and easements with respect to the Codex property, which abuts Route 128 on the south and Route 138 on the west. Only one of the orders is directly involved in this appeal. Each order…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. Mass. CrincMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Patsy Paris v. United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Codex Corp. v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Natick Auto Sales, Inc. v. Department of Procurement & General ServicesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Callahan v. Boston Municipal Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Norfolk County Hospital v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- W.B. Mason Co. v. Staples, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.