Legal Opinion

State v. Cooley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 22, 1987No. 16931-9-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

Nathaniel Cooley, a juvenile, appeals his conviction for first degree statutory rape. He contends that the trial court erred in (1) finding the child victim competent to testify, and (2) admitting hearsay statements under RCW 9A.44.120, the child victim hearsay statute, made by the child victim to his mother, a social worker, and a detective. He asserts that suggestive interview techniques employed during pretrial interviews with the social worker improperly influenced the victim's memory, rendering him incompetent and his statements to her and others unreliable. We affirm.

Defendant Nathaniel…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HirschfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. State v. GroverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. State v. HirschfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State v. C.J.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API